News You Need to Know Today
View Message in Browser

Providers, payers and GenAI | Industry watcher’s digest | Partner news

Thursday, April 4, 2024
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

In cooperation with

Northwestern Logo

generative AI in healthcare

GenAI-focused market researchers: ‘The payer–provider divide is wide and has dangerous implications’

Healthcare providers and payers disagree on a lot of things. But the camps are united in their appreciation of workers who have GenAI-advancing skills―programming, statistics, machine learning, data processing and visualization. And so on.

Then too, that’s another area of friction, isn’t it? After all, providers and payers fish the same waters for AI-capable talent. In any case, the research that found the area of commonality also found almost three-quarters of providers and payers believe GenAI will make its greatest impact on health outcomes and patient experiences.

The work was conducted by HFS Research in partnership with the IT services and consulting company Cognizant. HFS says the team drew its findings from interactions conducted with executive-level leaders at 350 provider and payer organizations.

In a summary of the resulting report, HFS research leaders Rohan Kulkarni and Saurabh Gupta highlight six “illuminating and actionable highlights for the next wave of healthcare opportunities.” GenAI figures prominently without dominating their discussion:

1. A shift in funding helps address the diverse needs of health consumers.

The U.S. healthcare system must address each generation’s needs appropriately, which is “a growing demand the younger generations vocalize,” Kulkarni and Gupta write. “This demand should drive seismic shifts in thinking about how health and care need to be delivered.” More:

Enrollment in self-insured employer plans is soaring at the expense of commercial insurance with the resonance of new care delivery models, such as subscription-based primary care and digital-first care services.

2. Vertical integration is designed to expand influence and mitigate risks.

More than 50% of healthcare enterprises, including health plans and health systems, are reacting to both threats—loss of high-margin business, new competition—and opportunities, such as new markets and emerging technologies, the authors note. They comment:

These acquisition profiles reflect consolidation and vertical integration to expand healthcare enterprise reach.

3. Healthcare enterprises drive blind on health consumer needs.

“Despite having ambitious growth aspirations through acquisition, nearly 60% of health plans and health systems admit to lacking a robust understanding of their evolving member or patient needs,” Kulkarni and Gupta report. More:

Conversely, however, more than 50% of payers and providers claim they have the digital capabilities to meet consumer needs.

4. The payer-provider divide is wide and has dangerous implications.

Over 50% of health plans and providers recognize a high to very high disconnect between their respective operations that directly impact member experience and health outcomes, the authors write. Ironically, they add, there is a divergence in their belief of why the disconnect exists; while payers blame data integrity, providers blame regulations.

Despite the disconnect about the drivers of the disconnect, about 70% of payers and providers assign the highest priority to addressing their operational divide.

5. GenAI’s expected impact spans a spectrum.

Payers and providers are intrigued by GenAI’s potential, the authors underscore.  However, they note, “payers appear to be convinced that GenAI is a game changer, particularly for administrative functions.” By contrast:

Providers are more muted about the impact of GenAI but do agree it has the potential to positively impact care delivery.

6. The lack of GenAI vision can impact investments.

While more than 70% of payers and providers anticipate the greatest impact of GenAI on health outcomes and member experience, the HFS researchers report, only 20% have a vision for GenAI that is influencing their investment decisions.

Approximately 50% plan to invest between $1 million and $10 million in GenAI, with about 70% anticipating this spending will occur within the next two years.

Read the summary here. (Scroll down to obtain the full report.)

 

 Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Send in Mail

The Latest from our Partners

Activeloop Raises $11M Series A and Brings Its Database for AI to Fortune 500 Companies. Activeloop, the Database for AI company, helps enterprises like Bayer Radiology to train and fine-tune large language and deep learning models, while also leveraging its capabilities for storing and searching vast amounts of data. Activeloop's offering enables highly accurate multi-modal knowledge retrieval at low cost. Learn more about the Database for AI and the use cases in healthcare here.

 Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Send in Mail
artificial intelligence industry

Industry Watcher’s Digest

Buzzworthy developments of the past few days.

  • Healthcare has an annoying habit of envying other industries over technology innovation and adoption. Never mind that other industries are looking to healthcare as a technology bar-setter par excellence. As observed by one high-level tech expert, it’s no small thing that healthcare people are constantly pursuing AI-driven innovations that benefit patients and society as a whole. “Healthcare is on the bleeding edge of generative AI, defined by a new era of precision medicine, personalized treatments, and improvements that will lead to better outcomes and quality of life,” writes John Snow Labs CTO David Talby, PhD, MBA, in commentary headlined “4 lessons healthcare can teach us about successful applications of AI.” The piece is published by no less than the influential outlet CIO.com. Read the whole thing.
     
  • It’s time to update HHS’s existing Federal Health IT Strategic Plan. Can you lend a hand? If so, you have until May 28 to contribute a comment to the draft. This next version will cover the period from later this year till 2030. In a blogpost, ONC says it wants to put more emphasis than before on public health, health equity and, yes, AI. The draft as it now stands “acknowledges the swift evolution of AI and increased use in healthcare, emphasizing the urgent need for the federal government to navigate this transformative landscape both responsibly and effectively in health and healthcare,” ONC explains. More info plus a link to the document are here.
     
  • Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Investment specialists at The Motley Fool think not. Their team is out with picks for the 10 best-bet stocks to buy right now—and Nvidia didn’t make the cut. Equally intriguing is TMF’s headline for the piece: “Nvidia Is Bringing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to the Healthcare Space.” Wait. Bringing? Was “the healthcare space” bereft of AI until Nvidia sized us up and pounced? See what you think.
     
  • Here’s another question you may want to consider. Who should be held responsible when things go wrong with medical AI? Admittedly, this is not a new question. But it got a fresh airing-out from legal minds at a discussion hosted by the Foley Hoag law firm April 1. “An HHS proposal from 2022 would largely leave healthcare providers on the hook for verifying that AI tools work and don’t lead to discriminatory outcomes,” partner Colin Zick, JD, reminded attendees. “Physicians vehemently oppose the proposal and would like Congress to step in.” PowerPoint presentation here.
     
  • More than 3 of 4 healthcare workers are convinced AI will help make up for the shortages in their ranks. Some may be wishful thinking, as almost 60% name understaffing as the biggest reason they feel burned out. The findings are from a survey taken by the health-tech company Carta Healthcare. Feelings are mixed too. Just 37% of healthcare workers said they trust healthcare AI—yet 85.3% believe AI can help improve patients’ healthcare experience. More findings plus an infographic here.
     
  • China is seeing a wave of citizens wishing to re-animate their late loves ones via AI. The demand is there for both audio and video files. The Guardian reports that such experiences can be had for as little as 20 yuan (around $2.75). Some lawyers in China “argue that such content should be banned if it causes ‘mental pain’ to the relatives of the deceased,” the newspaper reports. However, China’s digital natives “are likely to experiment with digital afterlives faster than living policymakers can regulate them.” Read the rest.
     
  • Every so often a worthy publisher posts a refresher on AI terminology. Some of these glossaries are more helpful than others. Here’s a basic but good one courtesy of the fine folks at Health IT Analytics.
     
  • Local/regional AI news roundup:
     
  • Recent research roundup:
     
  • From AIin.Healthcare’s news partners:
     

 

 Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Send in Mail

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand

Innovate Healthcare