News You Need to Know Today
View Message in Browser

How long a wait for AI to pay off? | Healthcare AI newsmakers

Tuesday, March 12, 2024
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

Northwestern Logo ●  Nabla Logo ●  UCLA Health

returns on investment in healthcare artificial intelligence

When big returns on AI investment arrive in healthcare, providers will lag behind suppliers in marking the moment: Moody’s

Years will pass before the global economy’s healthcare sector sufficiently leverages AI to build major financial muscle off of it. And when that day gets here, pharma companies and medical device makers are likely to see gains well ahead of hospitals, clinical labs and other provider organizations.

The predictions come from Moody’s Ratings, which largely looks through the lens of corporate credit quality—an org’s wherewithal to pay its debts—to project the org’s future business performance. Credit quality is assessed and scored by one or more credit ratings agencies, of which Moody’s is one of the “Big Three” (along with S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings).

In a sector report released March 11, Moody’s supports its forecast with four key points, which the firm summarizes as follows:

1. Pharmaceutical and healthcare companies are rolling out the first applications from advances in AI technology.

All adopters can expect to wring considerable advantages out of AI, not least in boosts to productivity and efficiency, Moody’s notes. However, pharma firms and medical device manufacturers “will gain greater credit advantages” than healthcare providers and laboratories. Why? Because the industry players can further use AI to accelerate product innovation, Moody’s points out. In any case:  

The adoption of AI is still in the early stages [for everyone], and we expect it will take many years before the full extent of its benefits are felt.

2. Larger health-related companies are better equipped to harness AI, but companies of all sizes will need to invest.

The bigger they are, the greater their capacity to cash in. “Larger companies have more resources, both financial and personnel, to dedicate to embedding AI within their organizations,” Moody’s points out. Then too:

Market leaders typically have more proprietary data that they can use to customize AI products and so gain competitive advantage.

3. Data management and cyber risk are key credit challenges.

Massive datasets will advantage healthcare organizations of all types vis a vis organizations in other sectors, Moody’s suggests. At the same time, though, big data “also brings risks related to data quality and an increased threat of cyberattacks,” Moody’s writes. “The quality of data is crucial because inaccurate or incomplete data can lead to flawed AI outputs and decision-making, which have a direct impact on the health of individuals.” More:  

Cyber risk, which is already high in this sector, may increase if companies seek to acquire more sensitive patient data to drive the use and benefits of AI.

4. Regulation will play a fundamental role in the ultimate credit impact of AI.

Heavy regulation weighs on credit quality, Moody’s emphasizes, and healthcare is nothing if not heavily regulated. “Regulations for AI technologies are still in their early stages and differ by region,” the firm states. “New legislation could initially force companies to increase spending to ensure compliance.”

Over the longer term, this could have significant implications for credit quality if AI systems are subsequently restricted.

On regulation, Moody’s adds: “The size of the impact of AI technologies will depend on government policies around its adoption in healthcare services and companies’ ability to adapt to regulations, which are uncertain at the moment. However, deep regulatory knowledge and strong relationships with regulators among pharmaceutical and healthcare companies could help sustain credit quality.”

  • The report, which fleshes out each of the above points in considerable detail, is available to Moody’s subscribers here.
  • Yahoo! Finance has additional news coverage of the report here.

 

 Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Send in Mail
artificial intelligence doomsday mass extinction event

Industry Watcher’s Digest

Buzzworthy developments of the past few days.

  • Oh no. Another AI doomsday divination? Well, yeah. Sorry. But this one might be different. The report issuing the worrisome warning was commissioned by the U.S. Department of State. Its authors are executives with a small but influential firm called Gladstone AI. They’ve been advising the federal government on AI since 2021. Here’s the money quote from their intro section: “Given the growing risk to national security posed by rapidly expanding AI capabilities from weaponization and loss of control—and particularly, the fact that the ongoing proliferation of these capabilities serves to amplify both risks—there is a clear and urgent need for the U.S. government to intervene.” The next line says something about “catastrophic national security risks.” The report goes on to recommend concrete steps to head off said catastrophe. Gladstone introduces and links the report here. Time magazine has a worthwhile take on the work here.
     
  • Last week’s return of Sam Altman to OpenAI may pour gasoline on the Gladstone report firestorm. As Axios tech watcher Scott Rosenberg puts it, Altman’s comeback signals that AI will be, as feared by many, “shaped by rich men and the markets that made them rich, not by the scientists and engineers who are building it or the governments that will have to deal with its impact.”
     
  • But wait. Before it ends the world, AI will revolutionize healthcare—and for the better. (Emphasis added.) So believe the authors of a friendly-voiced report from the customer experience agency Hero Digital. The bulk of the report recommends helpful action items for healthcare leaders wishing to “scale AI impact without being worried about losing people’s trust.” Worth a read.
     
  • A new consortium of healthcare leaders has formed with and around Microsoft. Calling itself TRAIN for Trustworthy & Responsible AI Network, the group says its aim will be to “operationalize responsible AI principles to improve the quality, safety and trustworthiness of AI in health.” Provider members of note are many. Announcement here, Microsoft blog post here.
     
  • The Train consortium introduced itself at HIMSS24, which is underway now in Orlando. Lots more healthcare AI news is coming from there. Keep up with the headlines by way of HIMSS’s own conference coverage.
     
  • Meta’s AI strategists have designed a kind of large-language model that learns from video rather than text. The Facebook/Instagram parent says it’ll use the technology to “power our entire video ecosystem.” The model will refine video searches for users while putting advertisers’ wares in front of likely interested eyeballs. CNBC gives the gist.
     
  • Understatement of the week? “There’s challenges in terms of how this is shaping maybe how people think about real life human relationships with others.” The speaker is AP tech-culture journalist Haleluya Hadero. The “this” to which she refers is the use of chatbots to relieve loneliness. The quote is from an interview Hadero gave to PBS. Video and transcript here. (Note: The transcript refers to a popular companion bot as “replica.” Ahem. The proper name of “the AI companion who cares” is Replika.)
     
  • A few upcoming events of note:
     
  • From AIin.Healthcare’s news partners:
     

 

 Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Send in Mail

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Interested in reaching our audiences, contact our team

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand
Innovate Healthcare